โApr-07-2017 07:13 AM
โApr-09-2017 01:04 PM
murphysranch wrote:
I'm a Californian, and I'm furious about this new tax. Yes, all the extra has been swiped for the Bullet train, which is sooo stoopid. SW air just announced a whole bunch of new routes outa Sacramento and with fares so cheap, why would anyone want to take a fast train? And yes the Lottery - they also swiped that money from the schools. Our Moombean Gov is very good at "reallocating"....
โApr-09-2017 12:31 PM
โApr-09-2017 11:39 AM
Gdetrailer wrote:There are lots of things to care about when you're old and have limited time left here.
And THAT is the "crux" of the problem.. Entirely TOO MANY people who don't care just how much of their hard earned money is vacuumed out of their pockets!
โApr-09-2017 11:15 AM
Gdetrailer wrote:myredracer wrote:
I think ya'll need to stop whining about your gas prices is what I think... ๐ Our gas (metro Vancouver, BC area) is currently at approx. $3.75 USD per gal. - 2nd highest in Canada. Makes California look like a bargain to us.
Our local gas taxes total approx. $1.22 USD per gallon ($0.42 Can per liter). Since we are in a rural area, we don't even get the benefits of what the taxes go towards. Our local tax breakdown:
Well what do you expect, THAT IS HOW YOUR "FREE HEALTHCARE" IS PAID FOR!
Yeah, EVERYTHING IS MORE EXPENSIVE IN CANADA, we get that, that is what you get when everything is taxed to pay for all of the "free" stuff handed out like candy to all the non working along with those who do work.
There is no such thing as a "FREE" meal, someone must carry the burden (IE TAXES) to pay for those who don't work or don't want to be burdened to work.
โApr-09-2017 11:05 AM
โApr-09-2017 09:48 AM
myredracer wrote:
I think ya'll need to stop whining about your gas prices is what I think... ๐ Our gas (metro Vancouver, BC area) is currently at approx. $3.75 USD per gal. - 2nd highest in Canada. Makes California look like a bargain to us.
Our local gas taxes total approx. $1.22 USD per gallon ($0.42 Can per liter). Since we are in a rural area, we don't even get the benefits of what the taxes go towards. Our local tax breakdown:
โApr-09-2017 09:27 AM
โApr-09-2017 07:16 AM
RVMike wrote:
The money will not go to the roads, they have done this 3 other times and the roads are still ****. The Governor has the power to declare any program in financial need and can take the funds from any program. California is always broke but finds funds to help illegals.
โApr-09-2017 06:41 AM
jplante4 wrote:lanerd wrote:
If, and that's a big if.... the increase in gas tax is used ONLY for highway infrastructure...that will be great and I'm more than willing to pay the increase.:C
Ron
Only blue people in blue states believe this. The money goes into the general fund. Monies from the general fund goes to whoever will get a state rep re-elected.
โApr-09-2017 06:35 AM
fj12ryder wrote:lanerd wrote:Really, it doesn't matter to California whether you're more than willing or not. If you want gas/diesel you'll pay it. Like it or lump it. ๐
...
If, and that's a big if.... the increase in gas tax is used ONLY for highway infrastructure...that will be great and I'm more than willing to pay the increase.:C
Ron
โApr-08-2017 08:05 PM
โApr-08-2017 07:57 PM
NYCgrrl wrote:
The Amtrak NE corridor's revenue and usage, surpasses and supports the ENTIRETY of the system. The portion of the ride going from Boston to DC pretty much requires advance reservation for NE Regional and Acela due to popularity which in part is due to it's speed. It could go even faster if new track was laid in parts of the run and gosh the way I hear most RV.net posters comment faster is generally better:B.
How this country got so far behind the rest of the world in developing and maintaining a long distance rail system is a bit perplexing and anti progressive to me yet we are certainly a good half a century behind from what I can see.
โApr-08-2017 07:19 PM
โApr-08-2017 06:51 PM
โApr-08-2017 06:42 PM
minnow wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:minnow wrote:spoon059 wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:
Of course the reverse can be said of car-less citizens who pay for roads they have no direct use for. In some parts of the country mass transit is the norm and car ownership unusual.
The difference is that those roads are used to transport freight, police and fire fighters... services that the car-less citizens still use. Those are essential services that benefit everyone in society and are part of the core goals of the federal government.
High speed transit that costs an exorbitant amount of money and benefits very few people is not a core goal of government...
And that shows the dichotomy between a blue state liberal living in a city and the rest of us that reside in the real world.
Not sure what you think that adds to the conversation besides your apparent disdain for people with different ideas than your own but truly some people think it's all about them and their ways.
So be it....but just as a heads up- there's a heck of a lot more people living in urban areas than not. By your way of thinking guess the majority rules and we should take your pig farm subsidy away from you just cause we don't understand the value of swine.
I worked in NYC for 3 years - saw many a swine there too.