โJan-25-2017 11:01 AM
โJan-27-2017 06:05 PM
โJan-27-2017 04:40 PM
โJan-27-2017 03:44 PM
โJan-27-2017 12:05 PM
โJan-27-2017 08:02 AM
Walaby wrote:
Might come across as sarcastic, but not really meant to be. If going by the sticker and numbers particular to your vehicle (as published by manufacturer) don't make sense to you, then go with what you feel comfortable with.
You're doing a lot of guessing, so why not go find a scale and weigh your GC. Take some of the guess work out.
Old Biscuit gave the best answer to your immediate question.
Mike
โJan-26-2017 02:22 PM
โJan-26-2017 03:31 AM
โJan-25-2017 09:23 PM
Old-Biscuit wrote:
Payload is NOT GVWR minus UVW because no way to load a vehicle front to back with all weight spread equally across both axles.
According to JEEP:
Curb weight includes standard equipment and full quantities
of fuel, lubricant and coolant.
Payload is the maximum allowable weight of driver, passengers, cargo, and options, rounded to the nearest 10 lbs
Actual payload MUST take in account RAWR & Rear Tire Max Load Ratings
See pg. 10 of this 2016 JEEP Grand Cherokee spec
2016 JEEP Specifications
โJan-25-2017 08:07 PM
LarryJM wrote:Grit dog wrote:
At that, imagine the factors of safety designed into the vehicle components and don't obsess about a few......hundred lbs here or there.
IMO that is a VERY DANGEROUS ASSUMPTION. There are probably actual safety related design margins, but there are much more items like say drive shaft spline strength, u-joints, on and on that don't have the level of design margin built in that you are assuming.
Just your undefined "FEW HUNDRED LBS" can mean 100 to maybe 500/600 depending on an individuals definition which is totally SUBJECTIVE.
A couple of prime examples is the original cooling system for the 7.3L and the 4R100 tranny/TC system for the 7.3L. One requires a retro fit and the other is a well know "WEAK LINK" in the drivetrain. Neither of these IMO would classify as "SAFETY RELATED", but sure would ruin your day and cost a $$$$$$ if you ignored them or exceeded their original design concept/usage.
Larry
โJan-25-2017 02:35 PM
โJan-25-2017 02:22 PM
Grit dog wrote:
At that, imagine the factors of safety designed into the vehicle components and don't obsess about a few......hundred lbs here or there.
โJan-25-2017 02:00 PM
โJan-25-2017 01:20 PM
โJan-25-2017 12:13 PM