โNov-29-2015 05:31 AM
โDec-01-2015 03:49 AM
pasusan wrote:
I agree. Scarily enough, one of the top running presidential candidates trumps all the others in reacting without thinking. ๐
โDec-01-2015 03:18 AM
Geocritter wrote:I agree. Scarily enough, one of the top running presidential candidates trumps all the others in reacting without thinking. ๐mowermech wrote:EsoxLucius wrote:
Only an idiot would call water by the name dihydrogen monoxide.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax
Having read the DHMO MSDS, I can say that there is NOTHING in those Material Safety Data Sheets that is untrue!
The only "hoax" is due to people without critical thinking skills jumping on the "BAN IT" bandwagon without knowing what they are actually asking to have banned!
That is why when first confronted with this foofaraw, I googled "DHMO MSDS" and read about it. I didn't have to read very far at all before I realized exactly what the MSDS was discussing, and realized it was all a joke!
The point of the whole thing is that people should THINK!
Altogether too many people don't think, they just react!
That's the whole point of my thread. Thank you Mowermech!
Steve
โNov-30-2015 05:46 PM
RoyB wrote:
Glad someone cleared it up what DHMO is haha... I was scratching my head trying to come up with something RV RELATED with the acronym of DHMO haha...
Roy Ken
โNov-30-2015 02:22 PM
โNov-30-2015 05:29 AM
mowermech wrote:EsoxLucius wrote:
Only an idiot would call water by the name dihydrogen monoxide.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax
Having read the DHMO MSDS, I can say that there is NOTHING in those Material Safety Data Sheets that is untrue!
The only "hoax" is due to people without critical thinking skills jumping on the "BAN IT" bandwagon without knowing what they are actually asking to have banned!
That is why when first confronted with this foofaraw, I googled "DHMO MSDS" and read about it. I didn't have to read very far at all before I realized exactly what the MSDS was discussing, and realized it was all a joke!
The point of the whole thing is that people should THINK!
Altogether too many people don't think, they just react!
โNov-30-2015 04:43 AM
EsoxLucius wrote:
Only an idiot would call water by the name dihydrogen monoxide.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax
โNov-29-2015 07:45 PM
โNov-29-2015 06:21 PM
โNov-29-2015 05:34 PM
CavemanCharlie wrote:
I've almost been killed by it a number of times. It's even more dangerous when it gets below a certain temperature.
โNov-29-2015 02:11 PM
โNov-29-2015 01:51 PM
Dutch_12078 wrote:darsben wrote:Dutch_12078 wrote:darsben wrote:
If you do not mind big government then by all means try to get it banned. But if you are one of those against excessive government regulation then do not.
I think most people are against government regulations that affects them adversely BUT want the government to do something when they see it as beneficial. Two sides same coin.
Personally I think the site made into a clicky is FUll of caca.
Some uses of DHMO quoted by the article are;
in so-called "family planning" or "reproductive health" clinics,
as a byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion in furnaces and air conditioning compressor operation,
in cult rituals,
by the Church of Scientology on their members and their members' families (although surprisingly, many members recently have contacted DHMO.org to vehemently deny such use),
by both the KKK and the NAACP during rallies and marches,
by members of Congress who are under investigation for financial corruption and inappropriate IM behavior,
by software engineers, including those producing DICOM software and other DICOM software tools,
by popular computer science professors,
by aspiring young adult fiction writers and mental health advocates,
by international travel bloggers.
Even "caca" contains a percentage of DHMO, and every usage on that list is factual. Big government already regulates some aspects of DHMO use.
No the list is not factual unless you really SSSTTTTRRRRREEEECCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHH the truth to absurd proportions.
Having been on the ground floor of DICOM development which is a medical digital imaging protocol I never used DMHO unless the DMHO was in the things I used to deploy the products (unknown to me).
Why "members of Congress who are under investigation for financial corruption would be a group to use DMHO is beyond my speculative powers as would travel bloggers. These groups would not seem to be bigger users than the general population
It seems you might be among the few that haven't connected the dots to figure out that Dihydrogenmonoxide (DHMO), is more commonly abbreviated as "H2O". :R :B
โNov-29-2015 01:29 PM
darsben wrote:Dutch_12078 wrote:darsben wrote:
If you do not mind big government then by all means try to get it banned. But if you are one of those against excessive government regulation then do not.
I think most people are against government regulations that affects them adversely BUT want the government to do something when they see it as beneficial. Two sides same coin.
Personally I think the site made into a clicky is FUll of caca.
Some uses of DHMO quoted by the article are;
in so-called "family planning" or "reproductive health" clinics,
as a byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion in furnaces and air conditioning compressor operation,
in cult rituals,
by the Church of Scientology on their members and their members' families (although surprisingly, many members recently have contacted DHMO.org to vehemently deny such use),
by both the KKK and the NAACP during rallies and marches,
by members of Congress who are under investigation for financial corruption and inappropriate IM behavior,
by software engineers, including those producing DICOM software and other DICOM software tools,
by popular computer science professors,
by aspiring young adult fiction writers and mental health advocates,
by international travel bloggers.
Even "caca" contains a percentage of DHMO, and every usage on that list is factual. Big government already regulates some aspects of DHMO use.
No the list is not factual unless you really SSSTTTTRRRRREEEECCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHH the truth to absurd proportions.
Having been on the ground floor of DICOM development which is a medical digital imaging protocol I never used DMHO unless the DMHO was in the things I used to deploy the products (unknown to me).
Why "members of Congress who are under investigation for financial corruption would be a group to use DMHO is beyond my speculative powers as would travel bloggers. These groups would not seem to be bigger users than the general population
โNov-29-2015 12:18 PM
Hiking Hunter wrote:
Anyone want to buy some dehydrated DHMO? Great prices & quantity discounts available.
โNov-29-2015 12:14 PM