โOct-28-2017 09:57 PM
โOct-30-2017 07:49 PM
โOct-30-2017 08:39 AM
colliehauler wrote:
Actually I had my seasonal site 8 years before I retired. Most seasonals where I'm at live in the Twin Cities 4 hours away. I agree the best scenario would be a site within a 3 to 4 hour drive at most.
You are correct in that I won't be heading back soon, probably not until next spring. I'm more interested this time of year heading South.
โOct-30-2017 08:16 AM
blofgren wrote:
My son definitely loves the hobby. He is truck and trailer crazy and has several toy trucks and fifth wheel RV's to pretend that he's headed out camping!
โOct-30-2017 07:20 AM
SoundGuy wrote:Actually I had my seasonal site 8 years before I retired. Most seasonals where I'm at live in the Twin Cities 4 hours away. I agree the best scenario would be a site within a 3 to 4 hour drive at most. You are correct in that I won't be heading back soon, probably not until next spring. I'm more interested this time of year heading South.colliehauler wrote:
My seasonal site is 900 miles from my house, any further North and I would be in Western Ontario.
Just got back from a 6 week stay.
Like I said earlier what works for me might not necessarily work for other's.
Your style of "seasonal site" would in truth work for very few ... after all, how many other than fully retired have 6 continuous weeks to take off and travel 900 miles just to get to their camper? :R Very few, and certainly not the OP, judging from what he's posted so far about his own particular situation. Reality is, the most logical seasonal site for the majority of us would be one within an hour or two of home, making it practical to use as often as we choose. Unless you too are fully retired I'd bet you won't be heading back to your own seasonal site anytime soon. ๐
โOct-30-2017 07:10 AM
blofgren wrote:
My son definitely loves the hobby. He is truck and trailer crazy and has several toy trucks and fifth wheel RV's to pretend that he's headed out camping!
We have thought about a seasonal site because of the convenience factor; the only issue with that is that they cost an arm and a leg in this neck of the woods.
I guess deep down I know it is a lifestyle we love and will most likely continue with it. We certainly do have a lot of good memories camping over the years and that has increased with our son. We are on our fourth rig now and really like this one so we will likely keep it, although the thought of downsizing is somewhat appealing at times.
โOct-30-2017 06:03 AM
โOct-30-2017 05:23 AM
colliehauler wrote:
My seasonal site is 900 miles from my house, any further North and I would be in Western Ontario.
Just got back from a 6 week stay.
Like I said earlier what works for me might not necessarily work for other's.
โOct-30-2017 02:59 AM
โOct-29-2017 08:33 PM
โOct-29-2017 07:40 PM
SoundGuy wrote:My seasonal site is 900 miles from my house, any further North and I would be in Western Ontario. I have had a seasonal spot for 12 years. I have gotten to know a lot of the other seasonals and they have become like family. What you are forgetting is that not everyone goes to their seasonal site at the same time. Just got back from a 6 week stay. Where I'm located there are only two neighbors close to me. I seen one neighbor only once when they arrived the day before I left. The other neighbors were there only for two weeks. I had more privacy then a transient Campground.colliehauler wrote:
I would try a seasonal site, takes all the stress of towing, setting up out of the equation.
It's about what works for you, everybody is different with different needs. All we can do is offer suggestions that work for us.
We've considered this ourselves but any seasonal parks we've investigated that are within reasonable driving distance have been - well, let's just say "less than desirable", partly because of how crowded private parks generally are and in some cases because of the clientele. ๐ Yeah I know, a generalization, BUT there's also always been a definite "clique" feel, where everyone seems to know everyone else and everyone else's business, unlike provincial or state parks where we know no one and prefer it that way. We do know of one park in the Adirondacks we really like but 600 km one way just to get there just isn't practical so for now we still transient camp just as we always have as that apparently mythical seasonal park where we'd be comfortable still manages to elude us. ๐
โOct-29-2017 04:51 PM
colliehauler wrote:
I would try a seasonal site, takes all the stress of towing, setting up out of the equation.
It's about what works for you, everybody is different with different needs. All we can do is offer suggestions that work for us.
โOct-29-2017 04:25 PM
โOct-29-2017 03:42 PM
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be
Douglas AdamsโOct-29-2017 01:16 PM
SoundGuy wrote:blofgren wrote:
We are on our fourth rig now and really like this one so we will likely keep it, although the thought of downsizing is somewhat appealing at times.
I'm confident some of us find this statement somewhat inconsistent with your earlier concerns about the costs involved in supporting your current RV lifestyle when a significant reduction in your investment and ongoing maintenance / operating costs could be made by downsizing not only the rig but also the truck you use to pull it with. Yes, you may really like your current 5th but honestly do just 2 adults and a 7 yr old really require a big 5th and a dually with which to pull it, especially when we're talking just weekends and a couple of week long trips each season? The answer from many of us would be no, not at all, since camping in a 20' travel trailer can be just as satisfying, as many of us do it all the time. I guess you're just musing at this stage but I know what my solution would be if I were in your shoes. ๐